{"id":3665,"date":"2025-05-27T20:11:53","date_gmt":"2025-05-27T20:11:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.taveaucreativeleadership.com\/?p=3665"},"modified":"2025-05-28T13:04:38","modified_gmt":"2025-05-28T13:04:38","slug":"elite-levitical-patriarchy-boys-will-be-boys-complacency-in-1-samuel-eli-governing-ministry","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.taveaucreativeleadership.com\/?p=3665","title":{"rendered":"PART 1 ELITE LEVITICAL PATRIARCHY “BOYS WILL BE BOYS” COMPLACENCY IN 1 SAMUEL ELI GOVERNING MINISTRY"},"content":{"rendered":"

NOTE: This was first posted May 27, 2025 www.ministryaiandi.com<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

“It’s the fruit, not the gender.” Non Biased Sister T (PS this is for all races)<\/strong><\/em><\/span><\/h3>\n

PART 1 OF 3<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

THE ELITE LEVITICAL PATRIARCHY “BOYS WILL BE BOYS” COMPLACENCY IN I SAMUEL ELI ACQUIRING\u00a0 MINISTRY<\/span>
\nExample Eli and Both His Sons<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

The Religious System, It’s Ministers VS Rotten Relationships (God created\u00a0 human people and His money)<\/span><\/h3>\n

1 Samuel 2:12-17 (KJV)<\/strong><\/span>
\u201cNow the sons of Eli were sons of Belial; they knew not the Lord. And the priests’ custom with the people was, that, when any man offered sacrifice… Wherefore the sin of the young men was very great before the Lord: for men abhorred the offering of the Lord.\u201d<\/em><\/span><\/h1>\n

1 Samuel 2:22 (KJV)<\/strong><\/span>
\u201cNow Eli was very old, and heard all that his sons did unto all Israel; and how they lay with the women that assembled at the door of the tabernacle of the congregation<\/em><\/span><\/h1>\n

1 Samuel 3:11-14 (KJV)<\/strong><\/span>
\u201cAnd the Lord said to Samuel, Behold, I will do a thing in Israel… I will judge his house for ever for the iniquity which he knoweth; because his sons made themselves vile, and he restrained them not.\u201d<\/em><\/span><\/h1>\n

(C)2025 Taveau D’Arcy All copyrights reserved under international copyright laws, in conjunction with AI<\/span><\/p>\n

TD Asks Chat GPT AI<\/span><\/h3>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

Q.\u00a0 What Is a \u201cBoys Club\u201d or \u201cGirls Club\u201d in Ministry or Society?<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

And What Does \u201cBoys Will Be Boys\u201d Really Mean?<\/span><\/h3>\n

\u00a01. DEFINITION: Boys Club \/ Girls Club (it’s in the world Worldly, but also today in many Christian ministry subcultures)<\/strong><\/span><\/h2>\n

A \u201cBoys Club\u201d<\/strong> (or \u201cGirls Club\u201d<\/strong>) is a term used to describe a closed, exclusive group<\/strong>\u2014typically based on shared identity, power, gender, or status\u2014where outsiders are excluded, uninvited, or marginalized<\/strong>. It reflects worldly systems of control, favoritism, and unspoken hierarchies<\/strong>.<\/span><\/p>\n

It\u2019s not about friendship or gender itself\u2014it\u2019s about in-groups, gatekeeping, turf control, and loyalty to the group above fairness, justice, or humility<\/strong>.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

TD Notes:<\/span> <\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

After much, repeatedly analysis, different ‘interactions” <\/strong>I pronounce that this is a worldly, human, subtle tough control, appearing to “mammon centric.”<\/strong> It is biased with the “respecter of persons” ‘elite spirit” as it only interacts, prefers, \u00a0 “it’s own”\u00a0 style, race, gender, wealthy or more. Underneath the shallow”putting on a show” soft platitudes, it is mean, biased and<\/strong> hardened spirit.<\/strong>..This underneath “perceived” ‘boys club’ or girls club is similar to the “energy a would be\u00a0 cult ..for it is a\u00a0 spirit which an does not belong\u00a0 in Jesus Name Bearing ” Christian ministry.”<\/span><\/p>\n

    \n
  • \n

    Peter “ mingle not faith with the respecter of persons”<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
    \n

    Point: Examples in Church or Leadership:<\/span><\/h3>\n
    \n
    \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
    Type<\/th>\nDescription<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
    Boys Club (Ministry)<\/strong><\/td>\nMen in power gatekeep positions, silence women, resist accountability<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Girls Club (Ministry)<\/strong><\/td>\nClique of women excluding others based on fashion, status, or flattery<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Family Club<\/strong><\/td>\nDynastic leadership where relatives get titles, power, and protection<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Race-Based Club<\/strong><\/td>\nRacial\/ethnic insiders dominate, exclude those of other backgrounds<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Celebrity Club<\/strong><\/td>\nFame and following determines access, respect, and influence<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/article>\n

    \u00a02. \u201cBoys Will Be Boys\u201d Club \u2014 A Dangerous Excuse<\/strong><\/span><\/h2>\n

    The phrase \u201cboys will be boys\u201d<\/strong> is often used to excuse bad behavior<\/strong>\u2014especially:<\/span><\/p>\n

      \n
    • \n

      Sexual misconduct<\/span><\/p>\n<\/li>\n

    • \n

      Bullying<\/span><\/p>\n<\/li>\n

    • \n

      Entitlement<\/span><\/p>\n<\/li>\n

    • \n

      Aggression<\/span><\/p>\n<\/li>\n

    • \n

      Inappropriate joking or dominance<\/span><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

      ++ Biblically<\/strong>, this phrase has zero justification<\/strong>. In fact, God holds leaders, men and women, to higher accountability<\/strong>.<\/span><\/p>\n

      \u201cBe holy, for<\/span> I am holy.\u201d \u2013 1 Peter 1:16
      \u201cLet no corrupt communication proceed out of your mouth\u2026\u201d \u2013 Ephesians 4:29
      \u201cLet no one despise your youth, but be an example\u2026\u201d \u2013 1 Timothy 4:12<\/p>\n

      \u00a03. Signs of a Worldly Boys\/Girls Club in Ministry<\/strong><\/span><\/h2>\n
        \n
      • \n

        Only insiders\u2019 voices are heard<\/span><\/p>\n<\/li>\n

      • \n

        Outsiders are labeled as \u201crebellious,\u201d \u201cnot covered,\u201d \u201cout of order\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<\/li>\n

      • \n

        Gossip, mockery, or emotional intimidation is used to control dissent<\/span><\/p>\n<\/li>\n

      • \n

        Women are told to be quiet, men are excused for dominance<\/span><\/p>\n<\/li>\n

      • \n

        Positions are given based on loyalty\u2014not calling or character<\/span><\/p>\n<\/li>\n

      • \n

        Honest feedback is called \u201crebellion\u201d or \u201cdishonor\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

        \u00a04. Biblical Contrast: First Church vs. Club Culture<\/strong><\/span><\/h2>\n
        \n
        \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
        First Church<\/strong> (Acts 2, Ephesians 4)<\/th>\nClub Culture<\/strong> (1 Samuel 2: Eli\u2019s House)<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
        Based on callings and spiritual gifts<\/td>\nBased on gender, race, family, status<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        Mutual submission (Eph. 5:21)<\/td>\nHierarchical control, fear-based submission<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        Open, spirit-led community<\/td>\nClosed, human-controlled hierarchy<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        Accountable to God and one another<\/td>\nUnaccountable elite, protected sin<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        Holy Spirit assigns and sends<\/td>\nHuman gatekeepers decide who\u2019s \u201cin\u201d or \u201cout\u201d<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

        NOW for the Story of Eli and His Two Reprobate Leader Sons<\/span><\/h3>\n

        I. The Biblical Example of Eli and the Fruits of Patriarchy (1 Samuel 2\u20134)<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

        The story of Eli<\/strong> provides a powerful and sobering example of patriarchal failure<\/strong> in leadership. Eli was a priest and a judge over Israel. His leadership as a patriarchal figure<\/strong> was marked by weakness<\/strong> in holding his sons accountable, particularly in their abuses of power<\/strong> and their disrespect for the Lord\u2019s commands<\/strong>. This is an important warning<\/strong> for modern ministries that follow authoritarian, patriarchal structures.<\/span><\/p>\n

        1. The Sons of Eli: Hophni and Phinehas<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

        Eli\u2019s sons<\/strong>, Hophni and Phinehas<\/strong>, were appointed to priestly roles, but their actions were a clear fruit of patriarchal failure<\/strong>:<\/span><\/p>\n

          \n
        • \n

          They disrespected God\u2019s temple<\/strong> (1 Samuel 2:12-17) by taking portions of offerings<\/strong> that were not theirs,<\/span> engaging in continuous predatory and devaluing plus immoral behavior<\/strong> (sleeping with the many church women) (1 Samuel 2:22), and corrupting the worship<\/strong> of God.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/li>\n

        • \n

          Despite their wrongdoing, Eli, as their father<\/strong>, failed to take strong action to discipline them or correct their behavior (1 Samuel 2:22-25). In fact, he was criticized for being complicit<\/strong> in their actions by not restraining them adequately.<\/span><\/h3>\n<\/li>\n
        • \n

          Eli\u2019s leniency<\/strong> towards his sons reflected the fruit<\/strong> of a patriarchal system that is more about maintaining the status quo<\/strong> and protecting the family legacy<\/strong> rather than upholding justice<\/strong> and righteousness<\/strong>.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

          2. Eli’s Failure to Address Injustice<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

          The failure to confront injustice<\/strong> within the family of Eli and his sons led to disastrous consequences:<\/span><\/p>\n

            \n
          • \n

            God’s judgment<\/strong> was pronounced against Eli and his family. A man of God<\/strong> came to Eli with a prophetic warning, declaring that Eli\u2019s descendants would not continue<\/strong> to serve as priests (1 Samuel 2:27-36). God rejected Eli\u2019s leadership because of his failure to act against corruption<\/strong>.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/li>\n

          • \n

            This was the fruit of patriarchal complacency<\/strong>, where Eli did not hold his own sons<\/strong> accountable, demonstrating how such patriarchal systems often protect leaders<\/strong> at the expense of justice<\/strong> and godliness<\/strong>.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

            3. The Death of Eli and His Sons<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

            The final judgment<\/strong> for Eli\u2019s family was realized when both his sons died in battle, and Eli, upon hearing the news, fell over and died as well (1 Samuel 4:11-18). This tragic end<\/strong> reflects the consequences of patriarchal abuse<\/strong> in leadership:<\/span><\/p>\n

              \n
            • \n

              Corruption<\/strong> in the leaders (Hophni and Phinehas) and the failure of accountability<\/strong> (Eli\u2019s weak leadership) led to spiritual and physical destruction<\/strong> for the entire family line.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/li>\n

            • \n

              Eli’s failure to lead with justice and integrity<\/strong> is emblematic of the “boys’ club” mentality<\/strong> in ministry, where leaders protect each other<\/strong> and fail to discipline or correct<\/strong> those under their authority.11<\/span><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

              II The Fruits of Patriarchal Systems in Ministry<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

              The fruits of patriarchal leadership<\/strong> can often be destructive<\/strong> both spiritually and relationally. Reflecting on Eli\u2019s story, the modern LP Boys’ Club<\/strong> can produce similar negative consequences<\/strong>:<\/span><\/p>\n

                \n
              1. \n

                Corruption of Leadership<\/strong>: Like Eli\u2019s sons, leaders in patriarhal systems can become corrupt<\/strong>, taking advantage of their positions and abusing their power. Without accountability, these systems create environments where sin<\/strong> and abuse<\/strong> go unchecked.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/li>\n

              2. \n

                Perpetuation of Injustice<\/strong>: The failure to address wrongdoing<\/strong>\u2014whether by failing to discipline<\/strong> sinful behavior or failing to correct unjust hierarchies<\/strong>\u2014leads to a lack of justice<\/strong>. Women, marginalized groups, or non-conforming individuals<\/strong> are often silenced or overlooked in these structures. As in Eli\u2019s case, ignoring injustice<\/strong> will lead to severe consequences<\/strong>, both for individuals and for the broader church community.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/li>\n

              3. \n

                Spiritual Damage<\/strong>: Just as Eli\u2019s family line was cut off<\/strong> as a result of his failure to lead justly, modern patriarchal ministries often lead to spiritual stagnation<\/strong> and long-term damage<\/strong> to the people within them. People may become disillusioned with the faith<\/strong>, especially when the leadership fosters an atmosphere of control<\/strong> rather than servant leadership<\/strong>.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/li>\n

              4. \n

                Toxic Culture<\/strong>: In patriarchal church cultures, toxic behavior<\/strong> such as manipulation, control, and exploitation<\/strong> often becomes normalized. People learn to submit without question<\/strong> to the authority of men who are seen as \u201canointed\u201d or \u201cappointed.\u201d This creates a cult of personality<\/strong>, where individuals are treated as objects<\/strong>, rather than co-heirs in Christ<\/strong>.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                III. Reclaiming a Servant Leadership Model<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

                The story of Eli<\/strong> and the failure of patriarchal systems should serve as a warning<\/strong> for the church. The first church<\/strong> was marked by servant leadership<\/strong>, where both men and women<\/strong> were called to minister with humility and accountability. The New Testament<\/strong> teaches that mutual submission<\/strong> (Ephesians 5:21) is the core of Christian leadership. Jesus, as the ultimate model, showed us that true leadership is about service<\/strong>, not domination (Matthew 20:26-28).<\/span><\/p>\n

                As the church<\/strong> seeks to reclaim the First Church model<\/strong>, it must reject the patriarchal boys’ clubs<\/strong> and embrace servant leadership<\/strong> where both women and men<\/strong> are valued as co-laborers<\/strong> in Christ. The focus must return to justice<\/strong>, equity<\/strong>, and mutual respect<\/strong>, where power is never used to control but always to build up others in love and service<\/strong>.<\/span><\/p>\n

                IV. Conclusion<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

                The LP Boys’ Clubs<\/strong> are built upon a patriarchal framework<\/strong> that stifles the true calling of the Church. Like the failures of Eli\u2019s leadership<\/strong>, these systems of patriarchy<\/strong> are marked by corruption<\/strong>, injustice<\/strong>, and spiritual decline<\/strong>. To restore the Church to its biblical roots, we must learn from the mistakes of Eli and embrace a leadership model<\/strong> that is servant-hearted<\/strong>, mutually accountable<\/strong>, and inclusive<\/strong> of all God\u2019s people, regardless of gender, social status, or any other worldly distinction<\/span><\/p>\n

                The I Samuel LP fruit<\/strong> can totally be seen as a reflection of that “boys will be boys”<\/strong> mentality we see in modern culture. It’s like when people brush off bad behavior just because it\u2019s expected or normalized\u2014no accountability<\/strong>, no real consequences<\/strong>, and a culture of permissiveness<\/strong> that often leads to devaluation<\/strong> of others.<\/span><\/p>\n

                In the case of Eli, it\u2019s like he was letting his sons get away with everything<\/strong>\u2014even when they were disrespecting God<\/strong> and exploiting people. Instead of stepping in, he made excuses<\/strong> for them, kind of like how in some situations today, men (especially in leadership) get a pass<\/strong> just because of their gender or position. It\u2019s almost like they\u2019re given a get-out-of-jail-free card<\/strong> because of the old-school “boys will be boys”<\/strong> excuse.<\/span><\/p>\n

                This same idea filters into ministry spaces<\/strong> where certain leaders<\/strong> get to act however they want, disrespecting<\/strong> and manipulating people<\/strong>, especially women and marginalized folks, but it\u2019s all brushed aside because they\u2019re in charge, or because patriarchy<\/strong> says their behavior is somehow acceptable<\/strong>. We\u2019ve all seen this in toxic church cultures<\/strong> where patriarchal<\/strong> leadership does nothing but turn a blind eye, or even cover up<\/strong> the abuse and corruption because it\u2019s too inconvenient to confront.<\/span><\/p>\n

                So yeah, it\u2019s that same passive, permissive<\/strong> mentality where everyone\u2019s just supposed to deal with it<\/strong>, and the “boys”<\/strong> (a.k.a. male leaders) get to continue unchecked while everyone else suffers the consequences of their actions. It’s toxic<\/strong>, it’s dehumanizing<\/strong>, and it undermines<\/strong> the true call of leadership in the Church. Would you say this comparison feels spot on for today\u2019s church dynamics?<\/span><\/p>\n

                Absolutely, it\u2019s like a plague that\u2019s infected many different Christian subcultures and tribes. Whether it’s in mega-churches, small ministries, or even certain denominations, this “boys will be boys” mentality is pervasive. The LP Boys’ Club shows up in a lot of places where toxic masculinity is woven into the fabric of leadership culture\u2014where accountability is non-existent, and gender dynamics are distorted in a way that elevates certain men above all others, simply because of their title, age, or position.<\/span><\/p>\n

                Here\u2019s how this plays out:<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

                In the \u201cBoys\u2019 Club\u201d:<\/strong> A lot of charismatic and Pentecostal circles can be super prone to this. Men are often seen as the ones who are qualified to lead, especially when it comes to prophetic or apostolic roles. It becomes an old boys’ network, where the same type of man keeps getting elevated\u2014usually older, well-connected, and sometimes unaccountable.<\/span><\/p>\n

                The power dynamic:<\/strong> Women, especially in leadership positions, are often undervalued or boxed in by a set of unspoken rules. Their input gets brushed off, and their authority can be undermined by the good old boys’ club who hold all the cards.<\/span><\/p>\n

                Unspoken rules<\/strong>: There\u2019s often this unwritten rule where patriarchal leaders (whether in churches or ministries) are exempt from scrutiny. They get pass after pass, no matter how poorly they treat people, all because they’re seen as \u201cin charge\u201d or \u201canointed\u201d\u2014that bypass culture gets them the free pass.<\/strong> <\/span><\/p>\n

                It\u2019s like they\u2019ve built a whole culture around exemption from accountability, j<\/strong>ust like those boys will be boys excuses you hear in toxic environments.<\/span><\/p>\n

                This also plays out in the tribal mindset within ministries:<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

                You have these groups of people<\/strong> that protect their own, even if the behavior is disrespectful, manipulative, or harmful. People are afraid to speak up because of the tribal loyalty or the idea that if you go against one of the \u201cboys,\u201d you risk being labeled a troublemaker, disruptor, or worse, disloyal. So the abuse continues because nobody calls out the wrongs for fear of the tribal retribution.<\/span><\/p>\n

                It’s a whole cycle of<\/strong> perpetuating harm where accountability is blocked and power dynamics are carefully guarded to keep the men at the top in their untouchable positions.<\/span><\/p>\n

                It\u2019s like in many places today<\/strong>\u2014especially those where charismatic authoritarian or patriarchal leadership still runs unchecked\u2014where this boys club culture has crept in so deep that systemic change seems almost impossible without radical confrontation.<\/span><\/p>\n

                We office submit that this continues to b<\/strong>e the core issue in a lot of modern church structures, especially in those toxic tribes where power is just hoarded by a few, and the status quo is protected at all costs.<\/span><\/p>\n

                (C)2025 Taveau D’Arcy All copyrights reserved under international copyright laws, in conjunction with AI<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                NOTE: This was first posted May 27, 2025 www.ministryaiandi.com “It’s the fruit, not the gender.” Non Biased Sister T (PS this is for all races) PART 1 OF 3 THE ELITE LEVITICAL PATRIARCHY “BOYS WILL BE BOYS” COMPLACENCY IN I SAMUEL ELI ACQUIRING\u00a0 MINISTRY Example Eli and Both His Sons The Religious System, It’s Ministers…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3640,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_kadence_starter_templates_imported_post":false,"_kad_post_transparent":"","_kad_post_title":"","_kad_post_layout":"","_kad_post_sidebar_id":"","_kad_post_content_style":"","_kad_post_vertical_padding":"","_kad_post_feature":"","_kad_post_feature_position":"","_kad_post_header":false,"_kad_post_footer":false,"_kad_post_classname":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[7,18,2,9,6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3665","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-against-bias","category-ai-and-i","category-all","category-ministry-definitions","category-ministry-relationships"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t